P.S. A reader pointed out that someone like Michael Behe (Darwin’s Black Box) would probably fall somewhere between 2 and 3. If that is where you are at, you will have to make a difficult choice. My apologies.
3 thoughts on “October poll — creation and evolution”
None of the options covered my views… And someone like Michael Behe, a ID proponent would have no options either.
I don’t have a problem with evolution, but I do reject the naturalistic explanations. So I’m somewhere b/t 2 and 3.
I, too, was going to comment that you need an option between 2 and 3. I think the natural process of evolution is the most likely mechanism God used to create the diversity of species. However, I’m undecided on whether God jump-started the initial formation of life and whether he created Adam & Eve specially or took a pair of hominids and somehow imparted His image to them or (now I’m treading on thin ice) there was no literal Adam & Eve.
GeoChristian 
None of the options covered my views… And someone like Michael Behe, a ID proponent would have no options either.
I don’t have a problem with evolution, but I do reject the naturalistic explanations. So I’m somewhere b/t 2 and 3.
LikeLike
Kenny:
Sorry about that. I agree that Behe would be somewhere between 2 and 3 (though maybe closer to 3 than to 2).
LikeLike
I, too, was going to comment that you need an option between 2 and 3. I think the natural process of evolution is the most likely mechanism God used to create the diversity of species. However, I’m undecided on whether God jump-started the initial formation of life and whether he created Adam & Eve specially or took a pair of hominids and somehow imparted His image to them or (now I’m treading on thin ice) there was no literal Adam & Eve.
LikeLike