The GeoChristian

The Earth. Christianity. They go together.

Red counties, blue counties

You’ve all seen the red state/blue state maps on election night. Here’s a map showing the 2008 presidential election on a county-by-county basis:

counties2008

The USA looks red after all!

There is actually a lot more blue on the map than there was in 2004, when Bush defeated Kerry:

counties-2004

This 2004 map is asthetically much more pleasing than the 2008 map I found; I’ll keep on looking for a better 2008 map.

The 2008 map is from here. The 2004 map is from USA Today.

Grace and Peace

November 5, 2008 - Posted by | Maps, Politics

4 Comments »

  1. Comparing the two maps, one notices that the major changes seem to be in swathe of land adjacent to Canada bettwen Maine and Montana.

    The largest groups of counties won by Obama seem to be in the Red River valley on the North Dakota/Minnesota border and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. There seems to be much less gain by the Democrats further south. Why is this?

    Comment by Julien Peter Benney | November 12, 2008

  2. Since when do square miles have the right to vote?

    If they don’t, as is my latest information, what possible meaning could it have that the US map looks red if stained by majorities in the counties?

    Another ingenious attempt in the series of arguments according to which the US is still a centre-right country?

    Comment by SRW1 | January 17, 2009

  3. SRW1: Square miles don’t have the right to vote. But the fewer people on them, the more likely the people on them are to be Republican. This is the key insight of this map–the real split is not regional but rural-urban. The one exception is majority-black rural areas, which tend to vote Democratic.

    Comment by William | January 18, 2009

  4. How old is that hat of the rural-urban split in the US electorate?

    Be that as it may, there’s another reason besides the lack of novelty why I have a little trouble to buy this innocent explanation: Click ‘Canada election map’ under the menue ‘Possibly related posts’ above and read the comment under the map of Canada that appears, especially the part in brackets.

    Comment by SRW1 | January 19, 2009


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 131 other followers

%d bloggers like this: